Black Knights Tango Pdf Creator
History The opening originated in the 1920s, when it was played by both the (hence the name 'Mexican Defense') and the American (the 'Kevitz' in 'Kevitz–Trajkovic Defense'). Torre used it to defeat then-U.S.
Chess Champion in only seven moves. It was later played by the Yugoslav master Mihailo Trajkovic and the Soviet grandmaster. After decades of obscurity, the opening was revitalized by, who published a booklet and a book about it in 1992 and 1998, respectively. Orlov rechristened the opening the 'Black Knights' Tango'. Since 1992, the opening has been employed by a number of strong grandmasters, including, and. Yermolinsky has even ventured it against.
Basic ideas Although fairly uncommon, the 'Tango' has a sounder positional basis than most other offbeat openings: Black develops quickly, has a flexible, and is prepared to strike back in the center with 3.e5, or with.e6 and.d5. The opening has some distinct variations but it is highly, and may transpose to the, and. Possible continuations 3.Nf3 The most common move, preventing 3.e5. Black usually responds with 3.e6, although 3.d6, intending a kind of, is also possible. After 3.e6, White can play 4.Nc3 Bb4 (transposing to the Nimzo–Indian Defense); 4.a3, when Black can either play 4.d5 (reaching a kind of Queen's Gambit Declined or Ragozin System), or 4.d6 preparing 5.e5 or even 5.g6 ('championed by Bologan', according to Palliser), reaching a sort of King's Indian Defense; or 4.g3, when Black can transpose to the Catalan Opening with 4.d5, recommended by Palliser or 4.Bb4+, preferred by Orlov, which transposes to a Nimzo–Indian after 5.Nc3, or to a Bogo–Indian Defense after 5.Bd2 or 5.Nbd2. 3.Nc3 This is White's second most popular move. After the thematic 3.e5, one possibility for White is 4.Nf3, transposing to an English Opening.
Palliser recommends 4.e4 in response, while Orlov prefers 4.exd4 5.Nxd4 Bb4. Instead, the main line is 4.d5 Ne7. Now the game may continue in 'Tango' fashion, for example with 5.Nf3 Ng6, or transpose to the King's Indian Defense with, for example, 5.Nf3 d6 6.e4 (6.Bg5!?) g6 7.Be2 Bg7 8.O-O O-O, reaching the main line of the King's Indian by transposition. Another interesting but relatively unexplored idea is 3.e6, allowing White to play 4.e4 (other moves such as 4.d5, 4.Bg5, 4.a3, 4.f3, and 4.Nf3 are also possible), whereupon Black follows up with 4.d5. From that position, the main possibilities are 5.e5 (the main line), 5.exd5, 5.cxd5, and 5.Bg5. These possibilities can also be reached via transposition from the Flohr–Mikenas Variation of the English Opening (1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6 3.e4), although if Black wishes to play this way, the optimal move order is 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nc6.
Black Knights Tango
- Black Knights Tango Pdf Download; - Elsener Schwyz Bayonet Serial Numbers. - Annotated C Reference Manual Stroustrup Pdf Creator.
- Black Knights Tango Pdf Editor; - Samsung Cell Phone Driver Download Free. - Raymond Williams Country And The City Pdf Creator.
Retrieved 2009-03-06. Palliser, p. 1957), Pitman, p.
File name: Georg Orlov - Mexican Opening [Black Knights Tango].pdf.
234 (citing a 1952 game by Trajkovic). Walter Korn, (12th ed. 1982), David McKay, p. Retrieved on 2009-03-06. Retrieved on 2009-03-06.
Retrieved on 2009-03-06. He explained, 'this no-name opening has languished, rarely getting even an honorable mention. I hope to change that by first highlighting the defense with a catchy name. Thus The Black Knights Tango!'
Orlov 1992, p. His 1998 book added the apostrophe after 'Knights'. Palliser, pp.
Retrieved 2009-03-06. ^ Palliser, p. Orlov 1998, pp. Palliser, p.
Black Knights Tango
Orlov 1998, p. Orlov 1998, p. Palliser, p. Orlov 1998, pp. ^ Palliser, p. Orlov 1998, pp. Orlov 1998, pp.
Orlov 1998, p. Magic engine 1.1.3 key. ^ Palliser, p. Orlov 1998, p. Orlov 1998, p. Orlov 1998, pp. Palliser, p.
^ Orlov 1998, p. Palliser, p. Palliser, p. Orlov 1998, p.
Palliser, p. Bibliography. Georgi Orlov, Black Knights' Tango, International Chess Enterprises, 1992. Georgi Orlov, The Black Knights' Tango: Outwit Your Opponents from Move 2!, Batsford, 1998.
A Dynamic Answer to 1 d4, Everyman Chess, 2005. External links The Wikibook has a page on the topic of:. (arguing that 3. Nf3 does not prevent 3.e5).
This is an excellent opening book by an experienced author. Valeri Bronznik looks at various unorthodox lines that might be tried against 1.d4 and recommends a particular response to each one. A circumspect response is usually the order of the day, not an overtly aggressive one. The book will be of great practical value to players who open with 1.d4 as White: they are its main, intended readership.
Still, those who play the odd offbeat line against 1.d4, or would like to investigate a few: say the Polish ( 1b5), the Albin ( 1d5 2.c4 e5) or the Black Knights’ Tango ( 1Nf6 2.c4 Nc6), will find the book to be interesting and suggestive as well, a useful source of ideas. Bronznik provides a sober examination of opening systems that some other analysts have dismissed as dubious or downright bad, whereas many (though not all, in my humble opinion!) have merit. Often, you end up with positions where both sides have problems to solve – even though White is allegedly ‘better’.
The material is set out in three parts and 19 chapters. Part 1 (chapters 1-8) covers various first moves for Black other than 1d5 or 1Nf6. Among the lines looked at are the Polish, the Englund Gambit ( 1e5) and the Dutch Benoni ( 1c5 2.d5 f5), which Jonathan Levitt has christened the Clarendon Court Defence; the German author prefers a more descriptive or literal moniker. As for Part 2 (chapters 9-14), there Bronznik examines a number of lines arising after the moves 1.d4 d5 2.c4 and you will find chapters devoted to the Albin, Marshall’s move 2Nf6, the Schara-Hennig Gambit ( 2e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 cxd4) and various Stonewall setups (e.g. 2e6 3.Nc3 c6 4.e3 Bd6, as Ivanchuk played against Carlsen in 2009).
Not the Noteboom though, which is a pity: one would like to have learned Bronznik’s thoughts on this double-edged variation. In the final part, Part 3 (chapters 15-19), Bronznik provides coverage of some systems following on from 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4; systems such as the Black Knights’ Tango, the Budapest Gambit ( 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 and now either the usual 3Ng4 or Fajarowicz’s 3Ne4; both moves are discussed) and the so-called Snake Benoni (e.g.
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 Bd6). Several original analyses are presented throughout the book, 58 to be exact, and there are about that many complete games, their annotations laden with theoretical references and astute judgements. Above all, it is the spirit of serious enquiry that impresses one most about Valeri Bronznik’s book; there is much food for thought. Just one slight fault, which I can’t help but mention: the apostrophe in the title of chapter 19 comes before rather than after the ‘s’ (i.e. It is ‘Black Knight’s Tango’ rather than the correct ‘Black Knights’ Tango’). English grammar always has the last laugh, even when a book is written in German, as here. The publisher’s description of 1.d4 – Ratgeber gegen Unorthodoxe Verteidigungen can be read. And a pdf extract from the book is.
Book Details By Valeri Bronznik, 2010 ISBN: 2372.